User Tools

Site Tools


change_request:cr80

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
change_request:cr80 [2014/05/13 13:04] bobchange_request:cr80 [2014/05/13 13:07] (current) bob
Line 53: Line 53:
   * The new definition would be compatible with existing 8 bit implementations. For 7 or 9 bit it would be compatible with the most reasonable implementation under the current definition I could make up. In effect most likely no changes on vendor side are required except to support new formats.    * The new definition would be compatible with existing 8 bit implementations. For 7 or 9 bit it would be compatible with the most reasonable implementation under the current definition I could make up. In effect most likely no changes on vendor side are required except to support new formats. 
 As an alternative always use packed mode but define this. This would avoid the unpacked option with possibly much wasted memory (for 9-bit words). It would also safe the only available reserved bit in the CSDW. As an alternative always use packed mode but define this. This would avoid the unpacked option with possibly much wasted memory (for 9-bit words). It would also safe the only available reserved bit in the CSDW.
- 
-~~DISCUSSION~~ 
  
 ==== 4 PCM data type ==== ==== 4 PCM data type ====
Line 83: Line 81:
  
 6. In case word length >16 (or >32) bit are used in 16 (32) bit aligned unpacked mode, the placement of the bits is undefined. 6. In case word length >16 (or >32) bit are used in 16 (32) bit aligned unpacked mode, the placement of the bits is undefined.
 +
 +~~DISCUSSION~~
  
change_request/cr80.1400004294.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/05/13 13:04 by bob

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC0 1.0 Universal
CC0 1.0 Universal Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki